Most modern evangelicals would probably love to have lunch
with C.S. Lewis.
Lewis is one of the most revered thinkers of the last century, and his students and personal letters suggest he was something of a gregarious figure and wonderful conversationalist. This is not surprising considering his body of written work, which includes Mere Christianity, The Screwtape Letters, and the beloved Chronicles of Narnia.
Lewis is one of the most revered thinkers of the last century, and his students and personal letters suggest he was something of a gregarious figure and wonderful conversationalist. This is not surprising considering his body of written work, which includes Mere Christianity, The Screwtape Letters, and the beloved Chronicles of Narnia.
Thus, Alister McGrath’s recent work, If I Had Lunch with
C.S. Lewis, seems as much a piece of wish fulfillment as it does exploration of Lewis’
ideas. McGrath is wise, however, in not really placating this desire for the
reader via a fictional dialogue. Rather, out of respect for Lewis (and the
reader), McGrath carefully crafts scenarios of what we might expect from Lewis in conversation, rather
than provide a narrative of what would occur.
This difference is subtle but useful, as it avoids the “well, I don’t think it would play like that”
criticism that would plague any book containing imagined interactions with historic
figures.
This particular element of the book’s design created a great
deal of good will from me, for it showed two important facts about the McGrath.
First, his intention was not so much focused on his personal dialogue with
Lewis so much as Lewis’ continued dialogue with his readers. By focusing on
general topics that Lewis may address, McGrath consistently redirects attention to Lewis' ideology more than a characterization of it. Second,
the author’s methodology allows for the exploration of broader ideas that will
likely draw the reader further toward Lewis’ original, nuanced
writings. These are both splendid outcomes of the book's execution.
Indeed, a more appropriate title for the book may have been, "Lunches with C.S. Lewis”, which is not only shorter but also more reflective
of the book’s layout. McGrath introduces
the idea of food and fellowship with Lewis before setting the expectation of
the experience he intends to create, that were we—his readers, Lewis, and the author
himself—to come together on a regular basis, we would likely direct a question to
Lewis and in turn receive a thought-provoking answer, albeit one that could fit into a lunch-hour discourse.
In this way, each chapter highlights a specific type of
conversation we might have and the types of ideas Lewis might convey, as well
as anecdotes he would use. McGrath provides constant reminders that this is not
Lewis speaking so much as how we might expect him to speak given what he’s said in
his other texts and collected works. Herein lies the book’s most fascinating
element. McGrath distills his longtime knowledge of Lewis into clear, broad
ideas that pull from a variety of texts; and in doing so, he gives the reader a
wonderful overarching view of Lewis’ work while also showing the cohesion of
Lewis multi-faceted concepts and rounded approaches to life’s bigger ideas and
challenges.
This makes for a good read, particularly for someone like myself
who has read some Lewis but not much. Time and again I was
reminded of why I like Lewis’ work while I also felt the need to seek out more of
it. If anything, the book could serve as a C.S. Lewis primer, a book for a
young person who has read and re-read Narnia and would like to know a bit more
about the author and his opinions prior to diving into Lewis’ nonfiction. This
is not to suggest that McGrath makes light of Lewis' nuances or misrepresents him, but
it is to affirm the book’s strength in making the late author directly
accessible.
Overall, I enjoyed the If I Had Lunch with C.S. Lewis. This was not what I had
expected, but it was good—both in terms of presentation and content. The only
real criticism I have is that following McGrath’s thought process—where he
ends, Lewis begins, and so forth--can be tedious at times; however, I feel this is a minor critique
given the integrity of McGrath’s approach—an approach both respectful
of Lewis and useful to the reader. While this is not the type of work I’ll
revisit cover to cover, it is one to which likely I’ll return on particular
subjects, such as imagination and creation. Alistair McGrath has created a good piece of
material here; and while imperfect, the Lewis reader may find the book not only informative but also charming and enjoyable.
No comments:
Post a Comment